Dubbyaman
Member
Amen sir!! I was thinking the same thing.Can you guys be any more vague, what is up with this ?
"I know things but if I tell you I will have to kill you."
Is autifony part of the freemasons operating from Area51 or something?
Amen sir!! I was thinking the same thing.Can you guys be any more vague, what is up with this ?
"I know things but if I tell you I will have to kill you."
Is autifony part of the freemasons operating from Area51 or something?
Can you guys be any more vague, what is up with this ?
"I know things but if I tell you I will have to kill you."
Is autifony part of the freemasons operating from Area51 or something?
What is the difference betwee Retigabine/Trobalt and Autifony? And if Retigabine/Trobalt hasn't worked with many TT members, why would Autifony be any different? NOT trying to be negative, just curious.[/QUOTE
Firstly Trobalt has worked for many people. At least it has reduced the sound permanently.Thank you so much for the quick reply and welcome, preslys. I was just wondering if someone that knows a lot (@Danny Boy for instance) could shed some light in a few sentences and let me know why Autifony might hold much more promise for us.
@amandine thanks so much! Helps a ton. My only other question would be, for our friends that Trobalt has not worked for, is there still hope that Autifony will? Side effects aside, wondering whether the way each drug works on the KV3 channels is significantly different. If not, theoretically, couldn't anyone try Trobalt and have an idea of whether Autifony will work? Because that would tell them whether working on the KV3 channels can reduce their sound? Thanks again for the response!
@amandine thanks so much! Helps a ton. My only other question would be, for our friends that Trobalt has not worked for, is there still hope that Autifony will? Side effects aside, wondering whether the way each drug works on the KV3 channels is significantly different. If not, theoretically, couldn't anyone try Trobalt and have an idea of whether Autifony will work? Because that would tell them whether working on the KV3 channels can reduce their sound? Thanks again for the response!
Yes i guess anyone can take it to try it out - but the side effects are scaryBecause that would tell them whether working on the KV3 channels can reduce their sound? Thanks again for the response!
Stated in the text in the link: For patients with chronic tinnitus beyond the 18-month window being targeted by Autifony, a third potential treatment is making its way through clinical trials. MicroTransponder's therapy is a riff on a decades-old treatment for epilepsy and depression called vagus-nerve stimulation.
- If Autifony AUT00063 drug is meant only for people within 18 months tinnitus?? So this is not for longer sufferers (more chronic?) Only then VNS for them?? This is then very sad. Or is the 6-18 months just perhaps for the trial criteria and the AUT could work also for longer sufferers?
What do you think?
I interpret it as they are only talking about the criterias for the clinical trials since Autifony themselves states that their compound is for chronic T. If autifony only targeted acute T, they wouldnt have the 6-18 months criteria in my opinion. They would've went with 0-3 or 0-6 months for best results. However, no one knows if it will work or not and no one knows when exactly T becomes chronic.
I interpret it as they are only talking about the criterias for the clinical trials since Autifony themselves states that their compound is for chronic T. If autifony only targeted acute T, they wouldnt have the 6-18 months criteria in my opinion. They would've went with 0-3 or 0-6 months for best results. However, no one knows if it will work or not and no one knows when exactly T becomes chronic.
True...It'll be like AM-101 when it first started 3 months only. That's acute, then again...We have no clue how long the acute stages are.
Who cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (I cant believe u even asked this question lol)I wonder, how much will this drug cost, if it works?
Any severe suffere would!hence your question was mootFor me, I'd rather be homeless, if I could hear silence again!

It didnt work on that person who reported his experience here but according to the article I posted, the results from the VNS study will be published this autumn and that the data looks "promising".VNS doesnt seem to work.
We shall see!It didnt work on that person who reported his experience here but according to the article I posted, the results from the VNS study will be published this autumn and that the data looks "promising".
Ugh. This autumn?? The medical field just takes their sweet time don't they?
Oh wow. I stand corrected lol. For some reason I thought autumn was spring. But yeah, back on topic. I hope this drug works and hopefully we can see more success stories of those on trial between now and next year.What? The VNS study took place quite recently and this autumn is like now/soonish. I think that's pretty fast. Anyway, the VNS study has it's own thread. We're off topic.
I thing talking about price if drug works is not needed, off topic, useless...But for sure in some parts of the world it would be to expensive for most of domestic population. As well, it is the same with other drugs that are new on the market and first for some condition.
Price will depend of length of treatment. If it will be a magic pill that cures in one month it will be for sure expensive month. But if there is need to take for a months for results, it will be more affordable (I mean on monthly base).
What I think if that would be very expensive, and if it really works WORKS, we should make some kind of found for severe suffers in undeveloped countries....but firstly, hopes that aut is gonna for for most of us