I didn't, but now that you've said it I wish I did. I suppose, discounting past wars, we are living in an era of 24/7 sound that has never before existed. As to your other question, well I meant the opposite. I think research is comparatively small in scale and funding compared with other high-profile diseases, and unless someone working on a shoestring makes a truly new breakthrough then nothing much will change within the medical establishment concerning tinnitus and its evil cousin hyperacusis. Things can change though. I remember when HIV infection meant death within 18 months and alive 10 years from diagnosis was considered remarkable and rare survival.Do you mean the biggest cause of Tinnitus is the current time we are living in ? If so, i'd agree with that.
Sure would, but I would expect that it would incredibly hard to target any one nerve centre without a slew of side effects. I'd risk it though.A real medication that actually relieved tinnitus would be a big seller.
The biggest enemy of tinnitus is the current time we are living in.
Right now tinnitus only has 1-2 enemies...Autifony and maybe SF4.The biggest enemy of tinnitus is the current time we are living in.
No what I meant was, what do you do if you have a stomach ache, a broken shoulder, a bad hip, a toothe ache, an ear infection? See my point? There are definitive answers and solutions to all the things I listed. Pepto bismol, physical therapy, hip replacements, dental work, antibiotics. All these treatments and solutions were studied and perfected over time and we live in the time where all these things exist as a result of medical pioneering. For tinnitus, there is no gold standard of what to do yet. Yeah there are things in development but thats just it. If all of us started hearing this noise 10 years from now, we would have more things to turn to.If you meant, our current time is the biggest enemy of Tinnitus... Do you mean New Cures/Meds that may become discovered by modern medicine ?
Right now tinnitus only has 1-2 enemies...Autifony and maybe SF4.
If tinnitus wins we wont have any weapons for a long long......long time.
I have two relatives who are not old people who are, to varying degrees, disabled by having bad shoulder problems which cannot be fixed.No what I meant was, what do you do if you have a stomach ache, a broken shoulder, a bad hip, a toothe ache, an ear infection? See my point? There are definitive answers and solutions to all the things I listed.
This seems dangerous; I want these drugs to be at least somewhat effective, but the idea that they will work well for most T sufferers and continue to work without fail over a period of years seems incredibly optimistic to me. If they do, then great, but I'm not going to put my hopes and dreams into that basket because it seems like a good way to set myself up for horrible disappointment.I can not even thinking about failing of SF and Aut63
I never said T was the only thing that cant be fixed. I have a birth defect called Arthrogryposis that has lead me wheelchair bound for 32 years. My aunt has diabetes. My grandma has lung cancer. The whole point of my initial post was just saying that it is a bummer that we are not further along in medicine.The idea that tinnitus is one of the only things that can go wrong with you which can't be fixed, is just wishful thinking. Go ask any person over the age of about 50 if they have any medical problems which can't be fixed, they will all say yes.
I see. so you meant exactly what you said.. my bad. ( But i was talking about what Dubbyaman said not yourself )
So you're answering on Dubbyaman's behalf ?
A real medication that actually relieved tinnitus would be a big seller.
But it's like finding a cure for alzheimer's. How do you restore nerves after they've been damaged/have degenerated ?
The body has to heal itself.
Go to the BTA website. They have an interesting video on there about people with T and no hearing loss.That's just one theory of what causes Tinnitus. My hearing is perfect, so no nerve damage there.
If 50% of the population had chronic severe T, we might see more serious attempts at curing the problem. Look at how much money is collected and spent on cancer versus Tinnitus. Cancer is considered life threatening, not T.
When T becomes more epidemic and people start throwing themselves off of buildings, that's when it might be taken seriously.
@Mad maggot,
Your case only adds to the mystery of T. Aproximately 10% of T sufferers have little or no hearing loss. This is the essence of why T is such a complicated bugger to cure.
I agree to a point. However, current audiograms are not able to accurately gauge full hearing loss over the entire freq spectrum of human hearing as well as account for all the variables of hearing such as environmental, proximity, noise and other factors. If you have high frequency loss with some nerve damage due to loud noise exposure for example, then it may very well never show on any type test, and that would be enough to trigger some crickets in your head!@Mad maggot,
Your case only adds to the mystery of T. Aproximately 10% of T sufferers have little or no hearing loss. This is the essence of why T is such a complicated bugger to cure.
But most people even with no t could have a degree on hearing loss at some frequency or volume that can't be detected, I think all adults must have some sort of hearing loss outside the range of audio grams I just think t is more some sort of a brain issue or weak auditory nerves than just hearing lossI agree to a point. However, current audiograms are not able to accurately gauge full hearing loss over the entire freq spectrum of human hearing as well as account for all the variables of hearing such as environmental, proximity, noise and other factors. If you have high frequency loss with some nerve damage due to loud noise exposure for example, then it may very well never show on any type test, and that would be enough to trigger some crickets in your head!
Read these articles please.That's just one theory of what causes Tinnitus. My hearing is perfect, so no nerve damage there.